Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

HUDIBURG CHEVROLET, INC. v. Ponce

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Plaintiff Hudiburg parted with possession of the automobile in exchange for a $500 check and James’ promise to pay the balance, secured by a reservation of title. After the check proved worthless, Hudiburg did what it could to rescind the contract, but was unable to locate and repossess the car. James removed it to Wisconsin and sold it to a dealer who was acting in good faith, without notice, and for value.

If it be true, as claimed by Hudiburg, that under these circumstances James initially obtained no property interest in the automobile by virtue of the contract he could pass none to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Al's Auto Sales v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Harris v. TupekerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Mott v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Universal Credit Co. v. FinnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Valley Loan Service v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mattek v. MalofskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Met-Al, Inc. v. Hansen Storage Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Paschal v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Return of Property in State v. PippinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. In MATTER OF RETURN OF PROPERTY IN STATE v. PippinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API