Legal Opinion

Summerfield Co. v. Prime Furniture Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1922PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This suit in equity was brought to restrain the defendant from unfair trade competition with the plaintiff. The case was referred to a master. The rule required him “to hear the parties and their evidence, to find the facts, and report the same to the court.”

Certain objections to the master’s report are printed in the record, but no exceptions were filed as required by Equity Rules 31 and 32. Such objections are not before us. Therefore, on the appeals of both parties, there is nothing before us except the pleadings, the master’s report, the interlocutory decree and the final decree. Smedley…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Flagg Manufacturing Co. v. HolwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. New England Awl & Needle Co. v. Marlborough Awl & Needle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Regis v. H. A. Jaynes & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Datacomm Interface, Inc. v. Computerworld, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Druker v. Roland Wm. Jutras Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Norton v. ChiodaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Coca-Cola Co. v. Snow Crest Beverages, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API