Legal Opinion

Norton v. Chioda

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1945PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

This is a bill to restrain the defendants from using on their taxicabs a color scheme and design which the plaintiffs allege are similar to theirs. The master, to whom the case was referred, filed a report which was confirmed by an interlocutory decree from which no appeal was taken. The case comes here on the plaintiffs’ appeal from a final decree dismissing the bill.

The master’s findings may be summarized as follows: The fourteen plaintiffs are associated in the business of operating taxicabs in the city of Worcester under the name of Independent Taxi Operators Association (hereinafter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. New England Awl & Needle Co. v. Marlborough Awl & Needle Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Payne v. R. H. White Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Central Ry. Signal Co. v. LongdenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. Akin v. WarnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Srebnick v. Lo-Law Transit Management, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  4. Chilson v. Zoning Board of Appeal of AttleboroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Myers v. SalinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API