Legal Opinion
Regis v. H. A. Jaynes & Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 7, 1906PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
After the decision in this case, reported in 185 Mass. 458, a decree was entered enjoining the defendants from using the words “ Rex ” or “ Rexall ” in connection with the sale of preparations for the cure of dyspepsia, and ordering that upon the filing of a supplemental bill the case should be recommitted to the master for an accounting of profits since the filing of the original bill; and the first question which now comes before us is raised by the defendants’ appeal from this decree. The plaintiffs’ supplemental bill avers that since the filing of the. original bill the defendants have…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Underhill v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- C. A. Briggs Co. v. National Wafer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.