United States v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The United States sues to enjoin defendants from continuing their alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act), 21 U.S.C. §§ 301-392 (1976 & Supp. I 1977). These violations, as charged in the complaint, are that defend ants are marketing human drugs in interstate commerce without the requisite approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and without the testing required to show that the drugs are safe and effective for their intended uses.
Defendant Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc. (Premo) is a manufacturer and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Healthpoint, Ltd. v. Stratus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
- Healthpoint, Ltd. v. Ethex Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
- United States v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Church & Dwight Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- United States v. Undetermined Quantities of Various Articles of Drug ... Equidantin Nitrofurantoin Suspension .... Appeal of Performance Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.