Legal Opinion
Healthpoint, Ltd. v. Ethex Corp.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided July 12, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00757PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GARCIA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the Motions for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Healthpoint, Ltd. (Dkt.# 187, 188); the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt.# 204) and Ethex Corporation’s objections thereto (Dkt.# 217).
Where no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. In such cases, the Court need only review the Memorandum and Recommendation and determine whether it is either clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alpharma, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Pennfield Oil Company, Doing Business as Pennfield Animal Health, a Nebraska CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Petro Franchise Systems, LLC v. All American Properties, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
- Elbar Invs., Inc. v. Okedokun (In re Okedokun)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Condom Sense v. Jamal Alshahabi, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
- Pediamed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.