Legal Opinion
Church & Dwight Co. v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 23, 1994No. Civ. 94-2829PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Church & Dwight Co. Inc.’s motion for permanent injunctive relief. Specifically, plaintiff has applied to this Court for an order permanently enjoining defendant S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. from advertising that its carpet deodorizing products are “five times better” than baking soda. For the reasons set forth below, which constitutes this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the Court will grant plaintiffs motion for permanent injunctive relief.
I. BACKGROUND FINDINGS OF FACT AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Frank's Gmc Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- L'Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lana Lobell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Harlem Wizards Entertainment Basketball, Inc. v. NBA Properties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Gillette Co. v. Norelco Consumer Products Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Clark Const. Co., Inc. v. PenaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.