Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mendiola v. Graham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff John Mendiola filed his complaint in the circuit court alleging that he is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the state of Idaho; that he owned certain sheep, cattle and horses that he had been accustomed to graze on the public domain of the state of Oregon. He complains that the Oregon law, which was chapter 160 of the 1923 session of the Legislature of the. state of Oregon, as amended by chapter 138 of the laws of 1927, now being §§ 20-2101 to 20-2111, inclusive, Oregon Code 1930, is unconstitutional and void.

Audrey Ward filed a suit in the circuit court alleging…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Ward v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Tharalson v. State Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Andrus v. ClickIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Thompson v. Tobacco Root Co-Op. State Grazing DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API