Legal Opinion
Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 15, 2006No. EDCV 03-199 SGLPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS* MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
LARSON, District Judge.
What are the legal boundaries of an employee’s privacy in this interconnected, electronic-communication age, one in which thoughts and ideas that would have been spoken personally and privately in ages past are now instantly text-messaged to friends and family via hand-held, computer-assisted electronic devices? It is precisely this question that is before the Court in the form of plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Ontario v. QuonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. BunnellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Flagg ex rel. Bond v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Bunnell v. Motion Picture Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.