City of Ontario v. Quon
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION OF THE COURT
[560 U.S. 750]
2Opinion of the Court · KennedyJustice Kennedy
This case involves the assertion by a government employer of the right, in circumstances to be described, to read text messages sent and received on a pager the employer owned and issued to an employee. The employee contends that the privacy of the messages is protected by the ban on “unreasonable searches and seizures” found in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, made applicable to the States by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S. Ct. 1684, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1081 (1961). Though the case touches…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by223 opinions
- United States v. WarshakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Rehberg v. PaulkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Julie Peffer v. Mike StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- In re the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.