Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 22, 2007No. 2:06-cv-03206PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FLORENCE-MARIE COOPER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 136), filed July 2, 2007, and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 169), filed July 24, 2007. The Court has read and considered the moving, opposition, and reply documents submitted in connection with these motions. The matter was heard on August 20, 2007, at which time the parties were in receipt of the Court’s Tentative Order. For the reasons and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Robert C. Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Dale E. Harper v. Clyde Wallingford Larry Kincheloe W.L. Kautsky an Unnamed Mailroom Staff Member at W.S.P., A/K/A "d.s."Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. NovelPoster v. Javitch Canfield GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. In Re Google Inc. Street View Electronic Communications LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
  5. Valentine v. Nebuad, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API