Legal Opinion

United States v. Hillcrest Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1945No. 12936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDDICK, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the taxpayer is entitled to a credit for 1937 under section 26(c) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1936, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 836, against the surtax imposed by section 14 of the Act, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 823, on corporate profits earned but not distributed as dividends during the taxable year. The section under which the credit is claimed by the taxpayer and denied by the Commissioner permits a deduction from the corporate adjusted net income to the extent that such income could not be distributed as dividends…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Helvering v. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Paisley v. LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Superior Oil Co. v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Local Joint Executive Board v. Nationwide Downtowner Motor Inns, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
  3. City of Harlan, Iowa v. Duncan Parking Meter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Superior Oil Company v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Union Oil Company Ofcalifornia. Superior Oil Company v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API