Harlee v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant Harlee appeals from his conviction by a jury of indecent exposure to an eight-year old child in violation of D.C.Code § 22-1112(b) (1981). 1 We affirm.
At trial, after the panel of prospective jurors arrived in the courtroom for jury selection, but before voir dire and the selection of the actual petit jury, appellant’s counsel moved to dismiss the jury panel because it contained a disproportionate number of women — the panel consisted of approximately one-fourth men and three-fourths women. Defense counsel argued that the panel did not depict the actual ratio of the sexes in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barrows v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Diggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Pinckney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006