Legal Opinion
Pinckney v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 2006No. 02-CM-634PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Following a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of misdemeanor sexual abuse 1 and one count of attempted lewd acts. 2 On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of misdemeanor sexual abuse because the government failed to present evidence that he touched the victim’s “genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks,” as required by the statute, see D.C.Code § 22-3001(9),-3006 (2001), and that the evidence also was insufficient to support a conviction of attempted lewd acts. In addition, appellant contends that the trial court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Varela v. Hi-Lo Powered Stirrups, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Boyd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arthur v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Taylor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- ALEXANDER HUGHES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.