Los Angeles Furniture Co. v. Hansen
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frank G. Finlayson, Judge. Modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
This action was one of claim and delivery by which recovery of possession of a certain lot of furniture was sought to be secured. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff and defendant has appealed.
[1] The complaint was in the usual form appropriate to the character of the action and contained all the essential allegations. Demand for possession was alleged to have been made on the fourth day of May, 1917; that possession was refused to be delivered to the plaintiff by the defendant, and the value of the property was alleged to be the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars. By an amendment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Muncy v. BrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kipp v. CozensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- McConnell v. ReddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bailly v. LoockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Markall v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Dunlop v. FarmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.