Legal Opinion

Fiske v. Soland

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1968No. 2 CA-CIV 614PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLOY, Judge.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from an adverse judgment in a malpractice action brought against a surgeon in connection with treatment of a skin cancer. For our consideration, questions are presented as to whether the jury should have been instructed on the doctrine of “informed consent,” whether the trial court gave proper instructions to the jury on the standard of care required of a practicing physician, whether certain rulings on evidentiary matters were proper and whether the evidence supports the jury’s verdict in favor of the surgeon.

The essential facts are as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. YoughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kronke v. DanielsonArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Neeriemer v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Rubino v. De FretiasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1986
  5. Hoeffel v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API