Legal Opinion

Almanza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1986No. 1302-85PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated rape, under the former penal code, Sec. 21.03. See now V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 22.021(a)(3). On motion for rehearing the Fort Worth Court of Appeals withdrew its original opinion and reversed, finding “fundamental error” in the jury charge. Almanza v. State, 645 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1983). Review was granted in this Court, and the State’s motion for rehearing became the occasion for this Court’s holding that even a defendant claiming fundamental error in his jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Almanza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Chandler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Kemp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Ray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API