Legal Opinion

Almanza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1985No. 2-81-340-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*283OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

On original submission this court issued an opinion affirming the conviction of Cipriano Ramon Almanza, Jr. for the offense of aggravated rape. On motion for rehearing this court reversed the conviction for “fundamental” error, issuing a short opinion concerning the use of “and” and/or “or” in indictments and/or jury charges. See Almanza v. State, 645 S.W.2d 885 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1988). The Court of Criminal Appeals has reversed our judgment (although admitting that it was correct when written) and instructed this court to reconsider our action to determine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Kendell Shawn Vanbelle A/K/A Shawn Vanbelle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API