Buffalo & Grand Island Ferry Co. v. Williams
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The question to which wo will first address our attention is defendant’s contention that Williams was not a seaman within the meaning of the act under which suit was brought. On the date of accident Williams was in the employ of Fix Bros, aa a teamster on their farm. He had in prior years had considerable experience as a seaman and at various times had worked as a seaman on excursion steapiers and other vessels owned by Fix Bros. The vessel upon which he was injured was not owned by them but by the defendant corporation, of which they were stockholders and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Linstead v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Miller v. Browning S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Miller v. T. H. Browning S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- Duarte v. Christie Scow Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.