Legal Opinion

Duarte v. Christie Scow Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 14, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s complaint is definitely brought as a “seaman” under the provisions of the Jones Act, Title 46 U.S. C.A. § 688. Both the summons and the complaint bear a statement to the right of the caption that this is a “seaman’s action”. Paragraph Twelfth claims certain rights and privileges under the various acts of Congress that are referred to in § 688, supra. But plaintiff’s complaint shows on its face that plaintiff was never an employee of the defendant, Christie Scow Corporation, or of the impleaded defendant, the City of New York. At most 'plaintiff was either a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Buffalo & Grand Island Ferry Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Falcone v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API