Burnett v. Taylor
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KiMball, Justice.
The action is for recovery of the amount due on ten promissory notes and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage given to secure them. The issue as to the amount due on the notes was tried to a jury, and the verdict was in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed. From the judgment on the verdict, and foreclosing the mortgage, the defendant comes here on error.
The notes are for $320 each, dated December 30, 1913, made by defendant, payable to Jesse A. Taylor, the first note due January 1, 1914, and the others successively a year apart thereafter. The mortgage to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Albany City Savings Institution v. . BurdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Ruddy v. RossiSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- King v. Livingston Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Fred PetschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Merritt v. MerrittWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Yellowstone Valley Co. v. Associated Mortgage Investors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Schaffer v. Standard Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Young v. Colorado National Bank of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.