Legal Opinion
DAVID-THOMAS COMPANIES, INC. v. Voss
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1994No. C6-94-160PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Lien claimants challenge dismissal of their mechanics’ hen action, arguing that filing the hen with county recorder (rather than registrar of titles) was sufficient to preserve a hen on registered (Torrens) property. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Respondents Henry S. and Marion R. Reinke own three contiguous parcels of prop erty located in Hennepin County. Respondents leased the property to the Farmers’ Market Annex, Inc. (lessee). Pursuant to an agreement with the lessee, David-Thomas Companies, Inc., d/b/a DayCo Concrete and Company, Inc., Stuart Lumber Company, T. Schulz…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bloomington Electric Co. v. Freeman's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Geo. Sedgwick Heating & Air Conditioning Co. v. Riverwood Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Pella Products, Inc. v. Arvig Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Custom Design Studio, a Division of L.B. Baron Properties, Inc. v. Chloe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Randall v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Master Asphalt Co. v. Voss Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.