Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Hatch Mill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 22, 1965No. 34PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The plaintiff’s evidence disclosed that he had worked in the employer’s textile mill for more than 11 years. During the year and a half preceding his injury, he was a member of the maintenance crew which serviced and overhauled the mill machinery. His duties included grinding the carding machines.

At the time of his injury the plaintiff was in the act of removing from a tool box one of the two hangers by which the grinding apparatus was attached to the carding machine. Each hanger weighed approximately 47 pounds. The claimant testified: “I reached over in this box about four feet high to pick…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. THOMAS AND HOWARD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Keller v. ELECTRIC WIRING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Pardue v. BLACKBURN BROTHERS OIL & TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Searcy v. BransonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Turner v. Burke Hosiery MillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Starr v. Charlotte Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Hill v. Hanes Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Rhinehart v. Roberts Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Russell v. Pharr Yarns, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Dillingham v. Yeargin Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API