Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Town of Stonington

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 16, 2000No. SC 16219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The defendant, the town of Stonington, appeals from the judgment of the trial court reducing the tax assessments levied by its board of tax review upon the real property of the plaintiff, Malcolm Robertson.1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a property owner is barred from bringing a property tax appeal under General Statutes § 12-117a2 *257if the property owner has entered into an agreement in violation of the public policy of this state as expressed in General Statutes § 51-86.3 We conclude that there is no such bar. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Grievance Comm., Bar of New Haven County v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  5. Solomon v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. PartingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. D' Angelo Development & Construction Co. v. CordovanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. LynchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. In Re Protest Appeals of Lyerla, Kathy L. Liv. TrustCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. In re Tax Appeals of Lyerla Trust - (Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API