Legal Opinion
Matter of Bolton
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Fudickar v. Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co. (62 N. Y. 392) is not applicable, since the record does not show that the arbitrators meant to decide according to the law of the State or that they meant to be bound by any statute or decision. No opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond, Thacher and Med alie, JJ. Dissenting: Conway and-Dye, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Mole & Queen InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & FeuerringNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Behrens v. SkellyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- In re the Arbitration between Bakery Drivers & Salesmen, Local Union 791-IBT & Rochester Maid, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Matter of BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946