Legal Opinion

Behrens v. Skelly

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1948No. Civil Action No. 6269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McVICAR, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff seeks a judgment that all of the capital stock of the defendant Liggett Spring & Axle Company, and of the defendant Axleton Water Company and certain obligations of Liggett, consisting of judgments, promissory notes, mortgage bonds, open accounts, and interest upon the foregoing — such obligations together aggregating approximately $300,-000 — are the sole property of the plaintiff; that the defendants be ordered to assign *76and transfer the said stock and obligations to the plaintiff; that the defendants be required to account to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Behrens v. SkellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Barreto v. Otero de JovéSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
  3. Outboard Marine v. Florida Stevedoring Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Cat's Paw Rubber Co. v. Barlo Leather & Findings Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API