In re the Arbitration between Mole & Queen Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtHalpern, J.
The principal question presented upon this appeal is whether there is any power in the courts to vacate an arbitration award on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
The arbitration proceeding had been commenced pursuant to a provision of an automobile insurance policy issued to the appellant by the respondent insurance company, which provided that the company would pay all damages which the named insured or any member of his family was legally entitled to recover for bodily injury or death caused by the operation of an uninsured automobile. The policy required the submission to arbitration…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Donato v. American Locomotive Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Herbst v. . HagenaersNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Hirsch Construction Corp. & CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- MATTER OF CENT. GEN. HOSP. v. Hanover Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- East San Bernardino County Water District v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Silber v. SilberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lewis v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.