Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feuerring
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lottghbae, Ch. J.
By contract dated November 12, 1941, the parties fixed their respective interests in the assets of a Pennsylvania corporation and agreed that its business would be carried on by them'as joint adventurers. Capital for the enterprise was to be supplied by the respondents. The appellant was to contribute technical skill and experience in management. Provision for arbitration was made in this text: “ All disputes which may arise between the two parties regarding the application or interpretation of this agreement and of the legal relations connected therewith, which shall not be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Fudickar v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Matter of Cheney Bros. v. Joroco Dresses, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Matter of BoltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Skidmore, Owings Merrill v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins.Connecticut Superior Court · 1963
- John Thompson Beacon Windows, Ltd. v. Ferro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Behrens v. SkellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.