Land v. Land
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Miller
Affirming'.
This case presents this question: What effect, if any, is to be given other language in a deed which attempts to cut down an estate conveyed by the granting-1 clause?
By their deed dated December 21st, 1888, L. M. Land and Sarah J. Land, his wife, conveyed to M. Belle Land, the wife of Eugene Land, a farm in Payette county for the consideration of the grantee’s promissory note for $3,800.00, payable twelve months thereafter.
The granting clause reads ,as follows:
‘ ‘ The parties of the first part do hereby sell and convey unto the party of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Henderson v. MackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- Ratliffe v. MarrsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Bain v. TyeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Wilson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Franklin Fluorspar Company v. HosickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Forman v. GaultCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Ratliffe v. RatliffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Combs v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Murphy v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.