Forman v. Gault
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Willis
Affirming.
The sole question presented by these two appeals is whether Ernest C. Forman has title to a tract of land.
R. F. Gault, a widower with five children, married Lillian Forman, a widow with one child. Shortly after the marriage, Gafilt and his wife made separate conveyances of land to each of Gault’s five children. A little later Gault conveyed to his wife “for and during her natural life” a farm containing 111.93 acres. He reserved unto himself a life estate in the land, but did not then dispose of the remainder estate. About five years later, a child…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- May v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Altemus v. NickellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Baker v. BegleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Elkhorn Land & Improvement Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cox v. SimmermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Quarles v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Terrill v. CarpenterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1956
- Leitchfield Milling Company v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- McCoy v. ArenaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.