Springs v. Pharr.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by E. B. Springs, surviving partner of Springs & Burwell, against IT. N. Pharr, administrator of W. L. Owens, and W. E. & J. A. Berryhill, trading as Berryhill & Son, heard by Judge TF. A. Hoke, at October Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of MecRXENbubg County. Erom a judgment for Berryhill & Son, the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtCt-artc, J.
The plaintiff’s judgment was docketed 22 December, 1888. The defendants' Berryhill & Son obtained their judgment before Justice of the Peace, and docketed same 19 December. 1888. They obtained a judgment upon said judgment, and docketed same 2 December, 1895. The homestead of the defendant in the above judgment had been laid off 3 December, 1888. Said homesteader having died since said second judgment, the defendant Pharr, his administrator, Sold the homestead under a decree to make assets, ana the proceeds being insufficient to pay both above-named judgments, this action is submitted without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonald v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Gould v. HaydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Purdy v. DoyleNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- Doty v. Russell & PearlNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Mumford v. StockerNew York Supreme Court · 1823
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. Justices of the Municipal CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Lilly-Brackett Co. v. SonnemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- McDonald v. CulhaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Wolford v. ScarbroughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
- Adams v. DaviesUtah Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.