Legal Opinion
Mumford v. Stocker
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1823PublishedCited by 8 opinions
N. P. Talmadge, moved to enter satisfaction on the judgment record in this Court, on the ground that the plaintiff had sued, and recovered, and perfected a judgment thereon, in the Seneca Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the Court
Curia.
The motion must be denied. The judgment of the Common Pleas was not an extinguishment of the judgment here. Both debts are of equal degree. Satisfaction cannot be entered upon motion, on the ground of a recovery in another Court, until the judgment there is, in fact, satisfied. (a)
Motion denied.
Vid. Briggs v. Thompson, 20 John. 294.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Briggs v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1822
3Cited by8 opinions
- Springs v. Pharr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Steers v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Armour Bros. Banking Co. v. AddingtonCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1896
- Van Winkle v. OwenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896
- Griswold v. HillU.S. Circuit Court for New York · 1825
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.