Legal Opinion

Adams v. Davies

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1945No. 6777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Justice.

While the factual situation involved is rather complex, there is but one question presented on this appeal.

In February, 1933, Charles Adams, and Lillian Taylor, plaintiffs, and Florence Davies, brother and sisters, were owners, as tenants in common of the lands involved in this action, subject to a mortgage held by defendant Frederick W. Davies, husband of Florence. The Davieses were occupying the premises as tenants. In February of that year Davies brought suit, designated as No. 51032, against the aforementioned owners, to foreclose his mortgage. Adams and Taylor…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Commissioners of Taxing Dist. of Brownsville v. LoagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. President of Bank of the Metropolis v. GuttschlickSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Gray v. . Richmond Bicycle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Turner v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Terry's Sales, Inc. v. Vander VeurUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tindall v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Campbell v. PeterUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Gossner v. Dairymen Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Gossner v. Dairymen Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API