Legal Opinion

Lilly-Brackett Co. v. Sonnemann

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff brought suit upon a judgment against defendant obtained in the state of Massachusetts. Defendant answered alleging that a judgment, based upon the Massachusetts judgment, had been obtained by plaintiff against him and had become final in the state of Washington. The court gave judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings and from it this appeal is taken.

The only question presented is whether or not the judgment rendered in Massachusetts was merged in the judgment based upon it which was given in favor of plaintiff in Washington. This is a new question in California, so far as we are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bates v. LyonsNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  2. Springs v. Pharr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. McLean v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Junghans v. JunghansCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Ballentine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Moore v. Justices of the Municipal CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Wolford v. ScarbroughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API