Puchta v. Rothman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
Appellant sued for $50,000, for injuries sustained in a building which was under construction, when she fell through an opening in the second floor thereof onto a concrete floor 12 or 13 feet beneath. A general demurrer was sustained (with leave to amend) to each of the two counts of the amended complaint. Appellant declined to amend and judgment was entered for respondents for costs. This appeal followed.
Appellant’s statement of facts as alleged in the complaint is as follows: “On or about the 6th day of February, 1947, the defendants were engaged in the construction of a building in South…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone & Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Carter v. Livesay Window Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Owens v. TraversoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Marino v. ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Lopez v. Capitol Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.