Legal Opinion
Sixberry v. Buster
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 28, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 79-4044PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
Presently before this court is a motion by counsel for plaintiff requesting permission for counsel to contact the jurors in the case sub judice. This motion has been made subsequent to the rendering of a verdict by the jury. The reasons asserted by counsel in support of this motion can best be characterized as an attempt by counsel to improve his skills as a trial lawyer by ascertaining from the jurors which facets of the trial influenced their verdict. It is clear that counsel is not alleging any improprieties by the jurors in this case.
It…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation v. Tillie Mely, as Administratrix of the Estate of A. E. Mely, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- In re LeamerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olsson v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1986
- United States v. KanaheleDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996