Legal Opinion

Olsson v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided November 26, 1986No. IP 82-1888-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STECKLER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the defendant’s motion for leave to interview jurors pursuant to S.D.Ind. Local Rule 35. Local Rule 35 states:

“No attorneys appearing in this court, or any of their agents or employees, shall approach, interview, or communicate with any member of the jury except on leave of court granted upon notice to opposing counsel and upon good cause shown.
“This rule applies to ... any communication with members of the jury ... after the return of a verdict.”

The Court having considered the defendant’s motion now finds that the motion must be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haeberle v. Texas International AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Matter of BerningIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sixberry v. BusterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nabkey v. HoffiusDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
  2. United States v. McDougalDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API