BE & K Construction Co. v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Judge.
Appellant Minnesota Pipe Trades Association (MPTA) moved to intervene by right or permissively to prevent disclosure of information provided by its members in the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry examination process for high-pressure pipefitters licenses. Appellant argues the trial court erred by denying intervention under both theories. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
A. Underlying Action
On several occasions in the fall of 1989, BE & K Construction Co. (BE & K) and Michael Cochrane sought disclosure of numerous documents pertaining to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Annandale Advocate v. City of AnnandaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Norman v. RefslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Engelrup v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Husfeldt v. WillmsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.