State v. Requena
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Adrian M. Requena was convicted by a jury of rape. Requena was charged under the theory that he had sexual intercourse with J.C. when she was incapable of giving consent because of her medical conditions or because of the effects of her medications or both, which conditions were known by Requena or were reasonably apparent to him. K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-3502(a)(l)(C). Requena argues on appeal that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because J.C. clearly understood the nature and consequences of her sexual intercourse with him and consented to it. Moreover,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. RiceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- State v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- Requena v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- State of Arizona v. Earl Jefferson CausbieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. RandleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.