State v. Randle

Hill, J.:

Billy J. Randle, Jr., appeals his conviction of robbery, claiming insufficient evidence and improper jury instructions. When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged in a criminal case, tire standard of review is whether after review of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, an appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Beach, 275 Kan. 603, Syl. ¶ 2, 67 P.3d 121 (2003). We affirm.

Randle, originally charged with aggravated robbery, was convicted by a jury of…