Legal Opinion
Klutsenbeker v. Jackson County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 13, 2002No. 98-06559, 98-04553, 97-07040; A112885PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Claimant requested that employer expand the scope of two claim acceptances, each relating to a separate employment-related back injury. Employer denied the requests. An administrative law judge (ALJ) and then the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) affirmed. Claimant seeks judicial review. We affirm the denial of one request and, on the other denial, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.
On April 16, 1997, claimant experienced back pain while at work. He made a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Medical evidence established that the pain resulted from a strain, herniated discs, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile & EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Freightliner Corp. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- SAIF Corp. v. DobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cloud v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004