Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Plaintiff was injured while riding as a guest in the defendant’s car operated by its agent, O’Brien. He can recover only upon proof that his injuries were caused by the reckless misconduct of O’Brien, while in the course of his employment, within the provisions of the guest statute, General Statutes, § 1628. The trial court set aside the verdict upon the ground that, the jury could not reasonably have found either that O’Brien was in the course of his employ rnent at the time of the accident, or that he was guilty of reckless misconduct.

The jury might reasonably have found the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potz v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Freedman v. HurwitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  3. Ryan v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Coner v. ChittendenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Riordan v. GouinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stone v. RudolphWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Gilmartin v. D. & N. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. De Blassie v. McCroryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Williams v. Hous. Auth. of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Williams v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API