Legal Opinion
Freedman v. Hurwitz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1933PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiffs brought these actions to recover damages for injuries suffered in a collision between an automobile in which they .were riding as the guests of the defendant and another car, and from a denial of his motions to set the verdicts aside and from the judgments upon them the defendant has appealed. The jury might reasonably have found the following facts: The accident occurred about nine p. m. on September 1st, 1930, before it was very dark. The defendant had been on a trip from his home in Waterbury to Cape Cod, starting the morning of the day before the accident, driving about one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miner v. Connecticut River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Potz v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Worden v. Gore-Meenan Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Gover v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- Stout v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Dean v. HershowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Landrum v. RoddyNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Wray v. Fairfield Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- L'Heureux v. HurleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.