Legal Opinion
McConville v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 1995No. C6-94-1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
Certiorari on the relation of employee, Audrey A. McConville, to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing an award of workers’ compensation benefits. We reverse and reinstate the decision of the compensation judge.
Audrey A. McConville was employed as the office manager of the records division of the police department of the City of St. Paul. She ordinarily worked from 6:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. without any regular lunch period, but the employer permitted employee to take a lunch or exercise break during her working hours. During her break,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Youngberg v. Donlin Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Rosvall v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Funk v. A. F. Scheppmann & Son Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Starrett v. Pier FoundrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hohlt v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- McConville v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995