Legal Opinion

United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Maw

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1994No. C3-93-1613PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLEMING, Judge.

Appellant insurer challenges the district court’s conclusion that injuries sustained by an employee of the insured did not arise out of, and in the course of, the employee’s employment. We reverse.

FACTS

Raymond Staples worked as a laborer on one of Greystone Masonry’s concrete crews. The foreman of Staples’s crew, Bob Orchard, scheduled the order of projects on which the crew worked. The crew usually worked on more than one project per day. Orchard often did not know at the end of one work day what the schedule for the following day would be. Orchard’s practice was to go…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Auman v. Breckenridge Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Bookman v. Lyle Culvert & Road Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Milledge v. OaksIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Face, Festivals & Concert Events, Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Voeller v. HSBC Card Services, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Fetzer v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API