Legal Opinion
Castle v. Atkinson
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1905PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Submission on Agreed Facts.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HARTWELL, J.
The case is presented in order to obtain a determination of the plaintiff’s right, which he claims, that he is entitled upon the agreed facts to an injunction restraining and enjoining the secretary of the Territory from taking any further proceedings or steps in the matter of the first election for county officers required by the County Act to be held June 20, 1905, and from expending any of the Territorial revenues or money in connection therewith.
The plaintiff claims that for certain specified reasons the Act is unconstitutional and void, and that as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Larcom v. OlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Castle v. KapenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1884
- Schooner Robert Lewers Co. v. KekauohaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
3Cited by24 opinions
- Asplund v. HannettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- Mottl v. MiyahiraHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Akau v. Olohana Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Hawaii Government Employees' Ass'n v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- Territory of Hawaii v. MiguelHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.