Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Long

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Butler District Court. The material facts appear in the opinion. Judgment for plaintiff, Long, on August 14, 1888. The defendant Railroad Companies bring the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

The material facts in this case are substantially undisputed, and are that Long is the owner and has been in the possession of the land described in his petition for a long time prior to the commencement of this action, and to the building of the railroad by the plaintiff' in error, and is still the owner and in the possession and daily occupancy thereof; that into and over the land of Long there ran a natural water-course which was fed largely, and in excessive dry weather entirely, from and by a spring on the *702land of an adjoining proprietor. The land is a part of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corning v. . Troy Iron and Nail FactoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Webb v. Portland Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1838

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. AllamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Schwartz v. HolycrossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. State v. Kansas State Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Cave v. HenleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. Pyramid Life Insurance v. Gleason Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API