Legal Opinion

Clark v. Allaman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1905No. 13,851PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Error from Wallace district court; Lee Monroe, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The parties to this litigation are contesting for the right to enjoy one of nature’s benignities. As if relenting from her severity toward the semiarid plains of Wallace county, where atmosphere and soil are parched in almost continuous drought, she has caused a number of springs of pure and wholesome water to break from the bosom of the earth and form the unfailing stream of Rose creek. Here wild things came in early days to slake their thirst; here the hunter of the bison and the wild horse lay in wait; and here the irrigation farmer came…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  2. Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Crawford Co. v. HathawayNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Abbott v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. GaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Bellport v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Colorado v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API