Legal Opinion

K.E. v. State

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 29, 1996No. 950297-CAPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge:

K.E. challenges the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to S.A.E. and K.L.E.. K.E. contends the Federal Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-1963 (1994) (ICWA), applies to the State’s petition for termination of her parental rights. The State concedes the ICWA applies and the trial court’s order must be vacated. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Following several years of involvement with K.E. and her children, the State filed a petition to terminate K.E.’s parental rights to her two youngest children, S.A.E. and K.L.E., based on neglect, abuse, unfitness, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. State v. EmmettUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Matter of Adoption of HallowayUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re KreftMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. In re J.R.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of Walter W.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Brown County v. Shannon R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In the Interest of W.D.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Brackeen v. HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API