Legal Opinion

People v. Shidler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 28, 1995No. 95SA223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent has admitted in a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct, C.R.C.P. 241.18, that he commingled personal and client funds, and that he negligently made unauthorized transfers of client funds. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation that the respondent be publicly censured. Given the factors in mitigation, we have concluded that a public censure is an adequate sanction in conjunction with certain financial monitoring conditions, and we therefore accept the conditional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. McGrathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. CantrellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. In re SatherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. GraySupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API